In my last post, I demonstrated the standards-based gradebook that I created using Google Sheets. Over the next few posts (hopefully without 2 weeks between each), I will demonstrate how to set up and use this gradebook to its fullest. I am continually adding to the gradebook, and I will share those additions as they happen.
The video above and the directions below should be all that you need to get started using the 3D, standards-based gradebook.
When I first started contemplating using standards based grading in my classroom, I realized that my traditional gradebook would be insufficient for my needs because it doesn’t allow for the complexity needed in a standards based system.
A traditional classroom gradebook, whether it is online or on paper has two axes representing students and assignments as shown in the graphic above. However, a standards based grading system requires that we add a 3rd axis representing standards.
In my last post, I wrote about a rubric creator that could be used to quickly populate the fields of a rubric for an assessment. I promised in that post that I would explain how to use that tool to quickly create assessments or projects for our students with a standards based rubric for assessing.
In order to do that, we need to look at the Assignment Sheet Template that I’ve created and how that works to create dynamic, standards based assessments for our classes.
There are 5 sections on the template, and each one of those sections is crucial to student success.
In my last post, I introduced the idea of creating a master rubric, and I suggested some strategies for creating that rubric using the RTI model. The next step with the master rubric is to be able to use it to create assessments that evaluate one or more standards.
While it is very possible and fairly simple to copy and paste standards from the master rubric into an assessment rubric, Google Spreadsheets can easily be used as a database and deliver content seamlessly to other spreadsheets when properly configured. To showcase this, I have created a “Rubric Creator” that will easily pull the criteria for only the standards that you want and leave out the standards that you don’t.
In my last post, I discussed the need for unpacking the standards and rewriting them in clear, easy-to-understand “I can…” statements. When approaching the standards based grading process, defining the standards in this way is an obvious first step.
After I finished writing my standards last summer as I was preparing to implement standards based grading, I went right into writing assessments. At the time, I thought that it made more sense to write individual rubrics for each assignment that would reflect the intent and objective of that assignment. However, it didn’t take me long to realize that this was a big mistake for a number of reasons.
When I first began musing about the idea of standards based grading, I realized that instituting the practice would mean rethinking everything in my classroom from top to bottom. It is not enough to simply change the way scores go into the gradebook. It requires retooling instruction, assessment, and management in a way that is completely focused on the course standards.
While I was very aware of the Utah State Core Standards and the Common Core, I hadn’t thought of them in the context of standards based grading. I had read through them, and I felt like I was teaching them to my students, but what I was really doing was teaching a broadly interpreted version of them without the laser focus that they really require. In order to grade based on standards, I needed to have a deeper understanding of them and narrow them down into teachable skills and concepts.
This is a video that I sent home to my parents to help them understand my grading policy. It is an example of the type of communication that I have found to be very valuable when instituting a standards based grading policy.
One of the first things that I had to do when I decided to do standards based grading was to develop a grading policy that would explain to students and their parents how I was going to grade and why I was doing it differently than all the other teachers in the building. To go through this process, I relied heavily on the works of Rick Wormeli and Robert Marzano, but I also wanted to make sure that the policy I developed reflected my own personality, goals, and strengths as a teacher. What follows is my grading policy as presented to my students and parents in the syllabus (note: SIS is our online gradebook system):
I believe that grades should tell a story of achievement and mastery. They should be a reflection of what a student has learned and what a student can do. The following guidelines will inform grades in this class:
Five years ago, my principal walked into my classroom as my students were chanting “One day without cocaine!” repeatedly and so loudly that it could be heard down the hallway. When she walked in and saw that I was leading the cheer, she asked me what the hell was going on and waited a little impatiently while I explained the purpose of the chant.
Since my classroom doubled as a computer lab, I had spent a lot of time learning to teach paperlessly and to use technology in useful and interesting ways. However, having technology in the classroom also led to management issues that I hadn’t encountered up to that point in my teaching career, like students wasting time on websites that had nothing to do with the lesson or the objective for the day. The problem wasn’t Facebook or Twitter. It wasn’t YouTube or any of the other typical time wasters.
My students were wasting insane amounts of time checking the online gradebook.